
About a week ago I went to see the new movie Stop-Loss. It's about the military and their right to call back soldiers to war even though their time is served. I was pretty surprised that they put out a movie about the War in Iraq, even when it is still going on. Normally that takes a while, although, it's got a really powerful point. I guess I'm sort of torn when it comes to movies like that. Part of me is like yeah! see how messed up that is? they just got sent back, even though their time is done! The other part of me realizes that it is a "Hollywood" movie, so it's played up quite a bit. And then the last past of me feels like a movie like this really shouldn't be used for entertainment value. This is a real thing going on.
So I researched what a stop loss really is, and
HERE is a pretty good article about it.
The article states, "In military terms, "STOP LOSS" means not letting a military member separate or retire, once their required term of service is complete." I really wonder how this is legal? But I think it is all different once it comes to military law.
The next part of the article explains how it works:
"STOP LOSS, on the other hand, means extending a military person in the Guard or Reserves, or on active duty, beyond what their normal separation date would be. Those who join the military agree to this provision under paragraph 9c of the enlistment contract states:
In the event of war, my enlistment in the Armed Forces continues until six (6) months after the war ends, unless my enlistment is ended sooner by the President of the United States.
That, is the basis of STOP LOSS. The Department of Defense maintains that the term "war" means anytime America's Armed Forces are engaged in hostile conflict, and not just "war declared by Congress." Would that stand up in court? We don't know yet, as STOP LOSS has never been challenged in court. However, there are eight Guard and Reserve troops who have banded together to file a class-action lawsuit against the Department of Defense for calling them to active duty, and then keeping them on active duty past their separation date, under the authority of STOP LOSS, so perhaps we'll soon find out."
I'm really interested to see what happens in these new stop loss cases! I feel like if a soldier did their duty, than we should honor them, and not be able to call them back.